Vineeta Srinandan vs High Court Of Judicature At Bombay ; 2025 INSC 1408 - Contempt of Courts - Ratio Decidendi
You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 12 -While an act may amount to contempt, the proviso to Section 12 of the Contempt Act empowers the Court to discharge the contemnor or remit the punishment awarded. The only requirement for exercising such power is that the apology must be genuine and acceptable to the Court. The Explanation to Section 12 further clarifies that an apology shall not be rejected merely because it is qualified or conditional, if it is made bona fide- Once a contemnor expresses sincere remorse, even if the apology is not unqualified in form, the Court is competent to accept it and, where necessary, discharge the contemnor or remit the sentence imposed. (Para 9.5)
Precedent - Ratio Decidendi - The ratio decidendi of a judgment must be understood in the context of its facts and the issue decided therein. Only where the factual matrix is materially similar can the ratio in an earlier decision be applied- where a decision turns upon its own facts or is guided by the peculiarities of a particular case, it does not constitute the ratio of the judgment- It is neither profitable nor permissible to rely upon isolated lines from a judgment, for the binding element lies in the ratio decidendi and not in every observation contained therein. (Para 9-9.1)
Contempt of Court - The power to punish necessarily carries within it the concomitant power to forgive, where the individual before the Court demonstrates genuine remorse and repentance for the act that has brought him to this position. Therefore, in exercise of contempt jurisdiction, Courts must remain conscious that this power is not a personal armour for Judges, nor a sword to silence criticism. After all, it requires fortitude to acknowledge contrition for one’s lapse, and an even greater virtue to extend forgiveness to the erring. Mercy, therefore, must remain an integral part of the judicial conscience, to be extended where the contemnor sincerely acknowledges his lapse and seeks to atone for it. (Para 1)
Case Info
Case Details
- Case name: Vineeta Srinandan vs High Court Of Judicature At Bombay On Its Own Motion
- Neutral citation: 2025 INSC 1408
- Coram: Justice Vikram Nath; Justice Sandeep Mehta
- Judgment date: December 10, 2025
- Disposition: Appeal allowed; High Court’s sentence set aside to the extent indicated
Caselaws and Citations
- Royal Medical Trust v. Union of India, (2017) 16 SCC 605
- Union of India v. Dhanwanti Devi, (1996) 6 SCC 44
- Rajendra Sail v. M.P. High Court Bar Association, (2005) 6 SCC 109
- Roshan Lal Ahuja, In re, 1993 Supp (4) SCC 446
- D.C. Saxena v. Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India, (1996) 5 SCC 216
- Perspective Publications (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1971 SC 221
Statutes / Laws Referred
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Sections 2(c) (criminal contempt), 12 (punishment; proviso and Explanation on apology), 19(1)(b) (appeal)
- Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023: Rule 20 (context from underlying writ)
"Contempt power is not a personal armour for Judges, nor a sword to silence criticism."
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) December 10, 2025
Read how Justice Vikram Nath of #SupremeCourt succinctly discussed contours of contempt power in today’s judgment: https://t.co/9uiZJBLaL4 pic.twitter.com/isRO9eAgaj
“Where a decision turns upon its own facts or is guided by the peculiarities of a particular case, it does not constitute the ratio of the judgment.."#SupremeCourt https://t.co/9uiZJBLaL4 pic.twitter.com/l0BKKErfhW
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) December 10, 2025

#SupremeCourt notes that, once a contemnor expresses sincere remorse, even if the apology is not unqualified in form, the Court is competent to accept it and, where necessary, discharge the contemnor or remit the sentence imposed. https://t.co/9uiZJBLaL4 pic.twitter.com/BQWPmYlCmI
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) December 10, 2025