Union of India vs Adani Power Ltd. -Customs Act - Special Economic Zones Act
Customs Act, 1962 -Section 12; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005- Section 26 -The levy of export duty on goods supplied from the Domestic Tariff Area to the Special Economic Zone is not justified. While dismissing appeal filed by UoI, SC observed: Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 is the charging Section. However, under Section 26 of the SEZ Act, power is reserved to grant an exemption or a concession if under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, a duty is leviable as per the charging Sections. (Para 4-7)
Case Info
Case Name and Neutral Citation
- Case Name: Union of India Through Secretary & Others vs. M/S Adani Power Ltd.
- Neutral Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4489 of 2023 (and connected appeals)
Coram
- Hon’ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan
Judgment Date
- Date: August 28, 2025
Caselaws and Citations
- The judgment refers to the impugned judgment in Civil Appeal No. 4489 of 2023 (Union of India through Secretary and others vs. M/S Adani Power Ltd.).
- It also notes that the Madras High Court and Andhra Pradesh High Court have taken similar views as discussed in the impugned judgment.
- Specific paragraphs referenced for legal reasoning:
- Paragraphs 41.1.3, 41.1.4 (first question)
- Paragraphs 41.2.10, 41.2.11 (second question)
- Paragraph 41.3, 41.3.4 (third question)
- Paragraph 42 (conclusion)
Statutes/Laws Referred
Customs Act, 1962
- Section 2(18): Definition of “export”
- Section 2(27): Definition of “India”
- Section 12: Dutiable goods
Special Economic Zones Act, 2005
- Section 2(i): Definition of “Domestic Tariff Area”
- Section 2(m): Definition of “export”
- Section 2(za): Definition of “Special Economic Zone”
- Section 51: Overriding effect of the Act
- Section 26: Power to grant exemption or concession
#SupremeCourt has dismissed UoI’s appeal against Gujarat HC judgment that granted relief to Adani Power Ltd by holding that the levy of export duty on goods supplied from Domestic Tariff Area to Special Economic Zone is not justified. https://t.co/KVP9C2cXYB pic.twitter.com/SEbPrlzpMw
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) September 23, 2025