Pension - CaseCiter

CaseCiter

Sign in

Pension

A collection of 10 posts

Ashok Kumar Dabas (D) v. Delhi Transport Corporation; 2025 INSC 1404 - Service - Gratuity - Pension

Read Judgment In LawLens Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Section 4,5 - An employee who had rendered not less than five years of service will be entitled to payment of gratuity, regardless of the fact that he had retired or resigned from service - Once it could not

Panchayat & Rural Development Department v. Santosh Kumar Shrivastava 2025 INSC 1142 - Pension - Govt. Accommodation

Service Law - The payment of retiral dues/gratuity/pension is not a matter of bounty but in fact a matter of right of every employee, should there be some rule or statute from where the right may originate. (Para 8) Pension and other retiral dues are benefits that have

Vijay Kumar vs. Central Bank of India 2025 INSC 848 - Pension Regulations - Central Bank Regulations

Service Law - Pension - Pension is not a discretion of the employer but a valuable right to property and can be denied only through authority of law. When an authority is vested with the discretion to grant pension less than full pension admissible under the Pension Regulations, all procedural

Reserve Bank Of India vs M.T. Mani 2025 INSC 769 - Pension - Cut Off Date Fixation - Financial Constraints

Pension - Cut off date fixation - Financial constraints can constitute a valid and non-arbitrary basis for fixing a cut-off date for extending pensionary benefits or pay revisions. It emphasized that economic considerations are germane to governmental policy decisions, and distinguishing between retirees based on such a date does not

Judicial Service

In Re: Refixation Of Pension Considering Service Period In District Judiciary And High Court 2025 INSC 726 - HCJ Act

High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - (i) The Union of India shall pay the full pension of Rs.15,00,000/- per annum to a retired Chief Justice of the High Court; (ii) The Union of India shall pay the full pension of Rs.

Motor Accident Compensation

Hanumantharaju B (D) Vs M Akram Pasha 2025 INSC 682 - Motor Accident Compensation - Pensionary Benefit

Motor Accident Compensation- Pensionary benefit could not be treated as “pecuniary advantage” liable to be deducted for the purpose of computation of compensation - Any amount receivable on account of PF, pension or insurance cannot be deducted from the salary of the victim for the purpose of determining the income

K. V. Gopalakrishnan vs Union Of India - Service Law -Pensioners’ Rights - Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC

Pension - A pensioner should not be made to suffer unnecessarily for the remissness of his employer. We expect the Government/employer to uphold pensioners’ rights and bring smiles on their faces, not force them to seek intervention of the Court. Pensioners being forced to approach the Court against the

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Dinesh Kumar Sharma 2025 INSC 370 - Pension - Service Related Claims

Service Law - Pension is not a charity, or a bounty, and an employee is entitled to receive his pension. As a matter of principle, belated service-related claims need to be rejected on the ground of delay and laches. However, where the claim relates to a continuing wrong, which does

Jaya Bhattacharya vs State Of West Bengal 2025 INSC 270 - Service Law - Pension

Service Law - Denial of pensionary benefits to an employee must emanate from any rule enabling the government for such denial. When the services have been regularized by treating the same as extraordinary leave the same cannot be treated as unauthorised leave for denying the pensionary benefits. (Para 11) 2025

Starpayal Natarajan Iyer vs State Of Gujarat - Service Law - Pension

Pension - Payment of pension is not a bounty but a recurring occurrence- Reiterated D.S. Nakara and Ors. Vs. Union of India: (1983) 1 SCC 305: AIR 1983 SC 130: (i) that pension is neither a bounty nor a matter of grace depending upon the sweet will of the