Miscellaneous - CaseCiter (Page 3)

Bharat Kishan Gangawane vs State Of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 690

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this order. Bharat Kishan Gangawane vs State Of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 690 Bharat Kishan Gangawane vs State Of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 690 .pdf205 KBdownload-circle

Miscellaneous

Prasannatma Das vs K.N. Haridasan Nambiar (D) 2025 INSC 717 - ISKON Mumbai vs ISKCON Bangalore

Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 -Section 22B - There is a mandatory requirement of making registration of a property of a Public Trust in the name of such Trust. (Para 54) 2025 INSC 717 Prasannatma Das vs K.N. Haridasan Nambiar (D)- ISKON Mumbai vs ISKCON Bangalore2025 INSC 717

Miscellaneous

Ishwar Chanda Sharma vs Devendra Kumar Sharma 2025 INSC 700 - Mathura Temple Matters

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment. 2025 INSC 700 Ishwar Chanda Sharma vs Devendra Kumar Sharma - Mathura Temple Matters2025 INSC 700 Ishwar Chanda Sharma vs Devendra Kumar Sharma - Mathura Temple Matters.pdf566 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian

Miscellaneous

Jawala Real Estate Pvt Ltd vs Haresh 2025 INSC 669 - NCDRC - Developer vs Homebuyer

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this order. 2025 INSC 669 Jawala Real Estate Pvt Ltd vs Haresh - NCDRC - Developer vs Homebuyer2025 INSC 669 Jawala Real Estate Pvt Ltd vs Haresh - NCDRC - Developer vs Homebuyer.pdf313 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal

Miscellaneous

Jindal Steel And Power Ltd. vs Bansal Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 2025 INSC 640 - Bank Guaranteee

Bank Guarantee - Bank guarantees serve as the backbone of commercial transactions and must be honoured in accordance with their terms -The Courts should refrain from interfering with the invocation of a bank guarantee except in cases of fraud of an egregious nature or in cases where allowing encashment would

Miscellaneous

Powergrid Corporation Of India Limited vs Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 2025 INSC 626 - Electricity Act - Tariff Regulations

Electricity Act - Tariff Regulations -Regulation 53 does not include within its scope replacement of ICTs due to damage or failure. Regulation 53(2)(iv) says that any additional work/services which have become necessary for the efficient and successful operation of the project but not included in the original

Miscellaneous

R. Ranjith Singh vs State Of Tamil Nadu 2025 INSC 612 - Executive Instructions - Retrospective Amendment Of Recruitment Rules

Executive Instructions - Government cannot issue executive instructions in contravention of the statutory rules- Executive instructions can supplement a Statute or cover areas which the Statute does not extend. They cannot run contrary to the statutory provisions or whittle down their effect. (Para 20-22) Recruitment Rules - State Government amending

Miscellaneous

Kaniz Ahmed vs Sabuddin 2025 INSC 610 - Demolition Of Unauthorized Constructions

Unauthorized Constructions - A person who has no regards for the law cannot be permitted to pray for regularisation after putting up unauthorised construction of two floors. This has something to do with the rule of law. Unauthorised construction has to be demolished. There is no way out. Judicial discretion

Miscellaneous

Shardhamma vs Dy. Commissioner 2025 INSC 583 - PTCL Act - Delay and Latches

Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Section 5 - Supreme Court held that, in this case, as the application under Section 5 of the was preferred after expiry of more than 10 years period, the same should have been dismissed on

Miscellaneous

GBJ Hotels Private Limited Vs Sriharan Sripathmanathan 2025 INSC 585

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this order. 2025 INSC 585 GBJ Hotels Private Limited Vs Sriharan Sripathmanathan 2025 INSC 585 GBJ Hotels Private Limited Vs Sriharan Sripathmanathan .pdf171 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian law professionalsAI-Driven Legal Research for Indian Laws

Miscellaneous

Amit Kumar vs Nihal Singh 2025 INSC 584

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment. 2025 INSC 584 Amit Kumar vs Nihal Singh 2025 INSC 584 Amit Kumar vs Nihal Singh .pdf75 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian law professionalsAI-Driven Legal Research for Indian Laws

Miscellaneous

Sri Venkateswara Constructions vs State of Odisha 2025 INSC 580

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment. 2025 INSC 580 Sri Venkateswara Constructions vs State of Odisha 2025 INSC 580 Sri Venkateswara Constructions vs State of Odisha .pdf626 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian law professionalsAI-Driven Legal Research for Indian Laws

Miscellaneous

Oswal Petrochemicals Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai 2025 INSC 578 -Central Excise Rules

Central Excise Rules 1944-Rule 56- The use of the word shall in sub-rule (2) is indicative of the mandatory nature of the provision. The officer who has taken the samples for testing has to communicate the result of such test to the manufacturer. Therefore, the officer is under a positive

Miscellaneous

Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Ason. vs Union Of India 2025 INSC 573

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment. 2025 INSC 573 Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Ason. vs Union Of India 2025 INSC 573 Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Ason. vs Union Of India .pdf400 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian law

Miscellaneous

A.J. Shetty And Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs St. Antony’s Charity Institutes 2025 INSC 547

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment. 2025 INSC 547 A.J. Shetty And Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs St. Antony’s Charity Institutes 2025 INSC 547 A.J. Shetty And Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs St. Antony’s Charity Institutes .pdf128 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered

Miscellaneous

Pawan Kumar Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh 2025 INSC 545

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment. 2025 INSC 545 Pawan Kumar Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh 2025 INSC 545 Pawan Kumar Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh .pdf117 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian law professionalsAI-Driven Legal Research for Indian Laws

Miscellaneous

Arunkumar H Shah HUF vs Avon Arcade Premises Co-Operative Society Limited 2025 INSC 524- Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act

Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer Act) 1963- Section 11- Quasi-judicial powers have been conferred on the competent authority while dealing with applications under Section 11(3) of the MOFA. However, proceedings before the competent authority under Section 11(3) are of a

Miscellaneous

Lakhani Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd.vs State Of Maharasthra 2025 INSC 489 - MHADA

MHADA - MHADA cannot also be said to have no jurisdiction to implement a Cluster Development Scheme, in a free hold land, since it is made possible as per the DCPR, if it is carried out jointly with the land owners/ Cooperative Housing Societies. 2025 INSC 489 Lakhani Housing Corporation

Miscellaneous

State of Madhya Pradesh vs Dinesh Kumar 2025 INSC 470

Note: No legal aspects discussed in the judgment. 2025 INSC 470 State of Madhya Pradesh vs Dinesh Kumar 2025 INSC 470 State of Madhya Pradesh vs Dinesh Kumar .pdf330 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian law professionalsAI-Driven Legal Research for Indian Laws

Miscellaneous

Dayananda Saraswati Swamiji (D) vs State Of Tamil Nadu 2025 INSC 465 -Writ Petition Challenging HR & CE Provisions

Summary : Writ petitions challenging various provisions of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act of various States- SC held: The petitioners could be permitted to approach the respective State High Courts to assail the said provisions since the scheme of the respective Scheme Acts may be distinct- a more effective

Miscellaneous

Kousik Das vs State Of West Bengal 2025 INSC 448 - RTE Act

Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Such of the teachers who were in employment as on 10th August 2017 and who had undertaken the 18 months D. El. Ed. through NIOS would be treated as valid diploma holders for the purposes of applying to other

Miscellaneous

Shri. Masaidevi Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Seva Sanstha Maryadit Warewadi vs State Of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 436 - Cooperative Societies - Govt. Resolutions

Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Section 4,6- if a society is unable to comply with the pre-condition or pre- requisite in regard to the economic viability of the society, allowing the registration of such a society which might not even be able to function, it may adversely affect

Miscellaneous

UCO Bank vs Vijay Kumar Handa 2025 INSC 442 - UCOBank (Employees’) Pension Regulations

UCO Bank (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995 - such of the employees who are otherwise entitled to superannuation benefits under the Regulations if visited with the penalty of removal from service with superannuation benefits shall be entitled for those benefits and such of the employees though visited with the same penalty

Miscellaneous

Superintending Engineer, Operation, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs Ch. Bhaskara Chary 2025 INSC 428

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment. 2025 INSC 428 Superintending Engineer, Operation, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs Ch. Bhaskara Chary 2025 INSC 428 Superintending Engineer, Operation, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs Ch. Bhaskara Chary .pdf280 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian

Miscellaneous

Secretary, All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society (AISSMS) vs State Of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 422 - Judicial Review - Academic Matters

Constitution of India- Article 226 - Judicial Review - Normally, courts should not interfere with the decisions taken by expert statutory bodies regarding academic matter: may it relate to qualification for admission of students or qualification required by teachers for appointment, salary, promotion, entitlement to a higher pay scale etc.