Labour Law - CaseCiter

CaseCiter

Sign in

Labour Law

A collection of 17 posts

State of Uttar Pradesh vs Krishna Murari Sharma; 2025 INSC 1500 - Industrial Disputes Act - Reference - Delay

State of Uttar Pradesh vs Krishna Murari Sharma; 2025 INSC 1500 - Industrial Disputes Act - Reference - Delay

Read Judgment In LawLens Note You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register

Srinibas Goradia v. Arvind Kumar Sahu -2025 INSC 1467 - Industrial Disputes Act - Workman - Dominant Nature Test

Srinibas Goradia v. Arvind Kumar Sahu -2025 INSC 1467 - Industrial Disputes Act - Workman - Dominant Nature Test

Read Judgment In LawLens Note You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur vs. Bhanwar Singh; 2025 INSC 1426 - S.17B Industrial Disputes Act

Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 17B- Section 17B of the ID Act provides for payment of full wages to workmen, pending proceedings in higher courts, against orders of reinstatement issued by Courts under the ID Act. This absolves the employer from complying with the order of reinstatement and Section

General Manager, U.P. Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Achchey Lal 2025 INSC 1175 -Industrial Disputes Act-Factories Act

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 -Factories Act, 1948-To ascertain or rather the relevant factors to be taken into consideration to establish employer/employee relationship would include, inter alia i.e. (a) who appoints the workers; (b) who pays the salaries/remuneration; (3) who has the authority to dismiss; 11 (4) who

Alok Kumar Ghosh vs New India Assurance Company Ltd; 2025 INSC 1239 - Employee’s Compensation Act - Insurer As Party Respondent

💡Whether in a proceeding initiated under Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 for compensation payable under the said Act, insurer could be made a party respondent? Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 - Section 19 - By virtue of power to determine liability under Section 19, the Commissioner would have power to

Management Of Worth Trust vs Secretary, Worth Trust Workers Union 2025 INSC 432 - Payment of Bonus Act

Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Section 2(17)- When it is established that the appellant is running factories, then there can be no doubt regarding the applicability of the Bonus Act. Just because such factories come under the broad umbrella of the appellant-trust, which is also involved in

Sheela Devi vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited 2025 INSC 516 -Employees’ Compensation Act

Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 - Section 4A - The necessary pre-requisite for imposing the statutory penalty under Section 4A(3)(b) is that the employer must default in payment of compensation due and the Commissioner must reach the conclusion that the non- payment is not justifiable (Para 13) - The

Joint Secretary, Central Board Of Secondary Education vs Raj Kumar Mishra - Master -Servant Relationship

Labour Law - For a person to claim employment under any organization, a direct master-servant relationship has to be established on paper- Document which only shows that they were posted at various places doing different nature of work would not establish master-servant relationship. (Para 7) Joint Secretary, Central Board Of

U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs Satya Ram 2025 INSC 339

Note: No legal aspects discussed in the judgment - SC allowed appeal against HC judgment - Labour Law Matter 2025 INSC 339 U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs Satya Ram 2025 INSC 339 U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs Satya Ram .pdf133 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover

State Of Goa vs Namita Tripathi 2025 INSC 306 - Factories Act - Laundry Business - Manufacturing Process

Factories Act 1948 - Section 2(m),2(k) - The business of laundry involving cleaning and washing of clothes including dry cleaning would be squarely covered by the expression “manufacturing process" (Para 33) [Context: High Court quashed the JMFC’s order, holding that dry cleaning does not fall

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs Subhash Laxmanrao Bramhe 2025 INSC 279 - Labour Law

Note: No legal aspects discussed in the judgment - SC dismissed appeal against Bombay HC judgment that refused to interfere with the order of the Industrial Court, which allowed the complaints by setting aside the revision of salaries of the workmen. 2025 INSC 279 Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs

Chief Manager Of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation vs Haneef Khan 2025 INSC 250 - Backwages

Note - No legal aspects discussed - SC partly allows appeal against HC order which granted full back wages- For nearly ten years the respondent herein, without performing any of his duties, cannot at the same time seek full back wages. 2025 INSC 250 Chief Manager Of Rajasthan State Road

Director Marketing Of Agricultural vs D. Khasim Saheb - Disciplinary Proceedings - Reinstatement - Acquittal

Disciplinary proceedings - Merely because the employee has been acquitted by a Criminal Court that alone would not result in his reinstatement in service when he has been dismissed from service after a departmental proceeding. This is for the simple reason that the standard of proof and the appreciation of

Shanti vs National Insurance Company 2025 INSC 234 - Employee’s Compensation Act - Interest

Employee’s Compensation Act 1923 - Section 4A(3) - The interest liability arises on default of the employer, in paying the admitted compensation due under the Act within one month from the date it fell due and if there is such default, necessarily interest shall run at the rate

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs Mahadeo Krishna Naik 2025 INSC 218 - Labour Law - Industrial Disputes - Back Wages - Burden Of Proof

Industrial Dispute - Back wages - If the employee pleads that he was not gainfully employed, he cannot possibly prove such negative fact by adducing positive evidence. In the absence of any contra-material on record, his version has to be accepted.- After the employee pleads his non-employment and if

Shripal Vs Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad 2025 INSC 144 -Labour Law - Uma Devi Judgment - U.P. Industrial Disputes Act

Shripal Vs Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad 2025 INSC 144 -Labour Law - Uma Devi Judgment - U.P. Industrial Disputes Act

Labour Law - SC judgment in Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Umadevi (2006) 4 SCC cannot serve as a shield to justify exploitative engagements persisting for years without the Employer undertaking legitimate recruitment- Uma Devi itself distinguishes between appointments that are “illegal” and those that are “irregular,” the latter being

Bastiram vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation 2024 INSC 934 - Labour Law

Summary: Appeal filed by workman who was dismissed from service- Disposing appeal, SC held: Appellant- workman held entitled to a compensation of ₹2,00,000/- to resolve the entire controversy in hand. Read Judgment In LawLens