Judiciary - CaseCiter

CaseCiter

Sign in

Judiciary

A collection of 15 posts

Nirbhay Singh Suliya vs State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 INSC 7 - Judiciary - Disciplinary Proceedings - Wrong Order

Disciplinary Proceedings

Nirbhay Singh Suliya vs State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 INSC 7 - Judiciary - Disciplinary Proceedings - Wrong Order

Read Judgment In LawLens Note You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register

Ranjeet Baburao Nimbalkar v. State of Maharashtra - 2025 INSC 1460 - States Reorganisation Act - Judiciary - Judicial Review - Administrative Matters

Ranjeet Baburao Nimbalkar v. State of Maharashtra - 2025 INSC 1460 - States Reorganisation Act - Judiciary - Judicial Review - Administrative Matters

Read Judgment In LawLens Note You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register

Savita v. Satyabhan Dixit - High Courts - Courts Of Record

Constitution of India - Article 215 - High Courts in India are the Courts of record and what is recorded in the Courts are correct and cannot be contradicted by the counsel for the parties. [Context: SC was addressing the contention thatthat the statement/concession made by the petitioner/defendant’

In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India - Judiciary

Judiciary - The High Court is a Constitutional Court and not inferior to this Court. However, in the judicial matters, when Supreme Court is seized of the matter it is expected of the High Courts to keep their hands away. (Para 10) Case Info Key Details * Coram: HON’BLE THE

Contempt Of Court

In Re: N. Peddi Raju 2025 INSC 989 - S. 406 CrPC - Judiciary - Advocates - Contempt

Note Sign in to read our notes on this judgment. Register @ citecase.in to subscribe ! Read Judgment Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 - Section 406 - Merely on the basis that a petition involves a political figure in a State cannot constitute a ground to transfer the proceedings from the

Shikhar Chemicals vs State Of Uttar Pradesh 2025 INSC 945 - Directions Against HC Judge Recalled

"Our intention was not to cause embarrassment or cast aspersions on the concerned Judge."

Code Of Criminal Procedure 1973: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Shikhar Chemicals vs State Of Uttar Pradesh - S.482 CrPC - Civil Dispute - Entrustment

⚠️Supreme Court recalled some directions issued in this order. Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 - Section 482 - In cases of civil dispute a complainant cannot be permitted to resort to criminal proceedings as the same would amount to abuse of process of law. [Context: SC criticized the High Court

Kaushal Singh Vs State Of Rajashtan 2025 INSC 871 - Bail - Strictures Against Judicial Officers

Kaushal Singh Vs State Of Rajashtan 2025 INSC 871 - Bail - Strictures Against Judicial OfficersKaushal Singh Vs State Of Rajashtan 2025 INSC 871 - Bail - Strictures Against Judicial Officers.pdf324 KBdownload-circle note We make notes on all Supreme Court judgments for our subscribers’ community consisting of judges, lawyers

Pinky Meena vs High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan 2025 INSC 756 - Women in Judiciary - Probationer Rights

Judiciary - A greater representation of women in the judiciary, would greatly improve the overall quality of judicial decision making and this impacts generally and also specifically in cases affecting women. (Para 29) Advancing women’s greater participation in the judiciary also plays a role in promoting gender equality in

All India Judges Association vs Union Of India 2025 INSC 713 - Court Managers – Recruitment & Conditions Of Service

Judiciary -Court Managers - Professionally qualified Court Managers are necessary to render assistance to the courts in performing the court administration - The appointment of Court Managers in the district judicial system would enable the District Judges to devote more time to their core work, that is, judicial functions- This

Contempt Of Court

Wikimedia Foundation Inc. vs ANI Media Private Limited 2025 INSC 656 - Judiciary and media - Subjudice principle

Judiciary and media - Subjudice principle - judicial attitude to the subjudice principle or interference in court proceedings or contempt of court discussed - Courts, as a public and open institution, must always remain open to public observations, debates and criticisms. Infact, courts should welcome debates and constructive criticism. Every

Constitutional Law

Vishal Tiwari vs Union Of India 2025 INSC 647 - Judiciary - Contempt -Judicial Review - Hate Speech

Constitution of India - Article 32,226 - Each branch of the State in a democracy, be it the legislature, executive or the judiciary, especially in a constitutional democracy, acts within the framework of the Constitution. It is the Constitution that is higher than all of us. It is the

Renuka vs State of Karnataka 2025 INSC 596- S. 498A IPC - S. 482 CrPC - Inconsistent Decisions

Indian Penal Code 1860 - Section 498A - Offences involving cruelty on wife would invariably arise out of matrimonial disputes. Accordingly, pendency of matrimonial proceeding between the parties cannot per se lead to an inference that institution of criminal proceeding alleging assault supported by medical evidence and independent witness is

Sarita Choudhary vs High Court Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 INSC 289 - Service - Probation - Women In Judiciary - ACR

Judiciary - A greater representation of women in the judiciary, would greatly improve the overall quality of judicial decision making and this impacts generally and also specifically in cases affecting women. - It is not enough to find comfort solely in the growing number of female judicial officers if we

Practice and Procedure

Sonu Agnihotri Vs Chandra Shekhar 2024 INSC 888 - Personal Criticism Of Judges In Judgments

Practice and Procedure - Personal criticism of Judges or recording findings on the conduct of Judges in judgments must be avoided- The superior courts exercising such powers can set aside erroneous orders and expunge uncalled and unwarranted observations. While doing so, the superior courts can legitimately criticise the orders passed