Consumer Protection Act

Poly Medicure Ltd. v. Brillio Technologies Pvt. Ltd.; 2025 INSC 1314 - Consumer Protection Act - Commercial Purpose

Consumer Protection Act 1986- Section 2- Even an incorporated company could be a consumer within the meaning of Section 2(1)(d) read with Section 2(1)(m) - The identity of the person making the purchase, or the value of the transaction, is not conclusive to determine whether the

Kopargaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. 2025 INSC 1315 - Insurance - Boilers

Consumer Protection Act 1986 - Insurance Law - Indian Boilers Act 1923 - Once a certificate of registration for use of boiler is issued, during currency of that certificate, the boiler concerned would be considered, prima facie, fit for usage. In such circumstances, to substantiate that the insured suppressed information

Consumer Protection Act

Rajnesh Sharma v. Business Park Town Planners Ltd 2025 INSC 1149- Consumer Protection Act - Builder - Buyer Disputes

Consumer Protection Act - Builder - Buyer Disputes - There is no principle of law that interest in default charged by the builder can never be granted to the buyer - the amount of interest should be reasonable. What is reasonable varies from case to case. The same is to

Consumer Protection Act

Palm Groves Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. v. Magar Girme and Gaikwad Associates, 2025 INSC 1023 - Consumer Protection Act - Interpretation Of Statutes

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 25(1) Of Consumer Protection Act 1986 !

Consumer Protection Act

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority vs Anupam Garg 2025 INSC 808 - Consumer Protection Act - Builder - Buyer Issues

Consumer Protection Act - Principles regarding grant/non-grant of relief to an allottee who is aggrieved by non-delivery or delay in delivery of plots/flats - Referred to Bangalore Development Authority v. Syndicate Bank (2007) 6 SCC 711 : Where the development authority having received the full price, does not deliver

Consumer Protection Act

Ganeshkumar Rajeshwarrao Selukar vs Mahendra Bhaskar Limaye 2025 INSC 752 - Consumer Forums

Consumer Forums -Directions issued : Union of India is directed to file an affidavit on the feasibility of a permanent adjudicatory forum for consumer disputes, either in the form of a Consumer Tribunal or a Consumer Court, within a period of 3 months from today, on the touchstone of the constitutional

Consumer Protection Act

Gopal Dikshit vs United India Insurance Company Ltd. 2025 INSC 731 - Consumer Protection Act - Insurance

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment- In appeal against NCDRC judgment, the issue raised was whether, the cause of loss to the premises is due to the seepage water or the heavy rains in Delhi- Allowing appeal, SC found that the damage to the insured premises was not

Consumer Protection Act

Rutu Mihir Panchal vs Union Of India 2025 INSC 593 - Consumer Protection Act - Pecuniary Jurisdiction Prescription - Constitutional Validity Upheld

Consumer Protection Act 2019 - Sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) -Constitutional Validity of provisions prescribing pecuniary jurisdictions of the district, state and national commissions on the basis of value of goods and services paid as consideration, instead of compensation claimed upheld - The

Consumer Protection Act

Managing Director, Kamineni Hospitals Vs. Peddi Narayana Swami 2025 INSC 527- Medical Negligence - Vicarious Liability Of Hospital

Medical Negligence - SC upheld NCDRC judgment that held the Hospital vicariously liable for medical negligence- However, the amount of compensation with regard to the liability of the hospital would stand at Rs.10 lakhs along with accrued interest. 2025 INSC 527 Managing Director, Kamineni Hospitals Vs. Peddi Narayana Swami

Consumer Protection Act

Chief Officer, Nagpur Housing And Area Development Board vs Manohar Burde 2025 INSC 398 - Consumer Case

Note- No legal aspects discussed in the order. 2025 INSC 398 Chief Officer, Nagpur Housing And Area Development Board vs Manohar Burde - Consumer Case2025 INSC 398 Chief Officer, Nagpur Housing And Area Development Board vs Manohar Burde - Consumer Case.pdf361 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover

Consumer Protection Act

Citicorp Finance (India) Limited vs Snehasis Nanda 2025 INSC 371 - Consumer Protection Act

Consumer Protection Act 1986 - When there is no privity of contract between the concerned parties therein, no ‘deficiency’ would arise and the action (complaint) would not be maintainable before the concerned Consumer Forum. (Para 17) Consumer Protection Act 1986 - Section 24A - While the NCDRC is competent to

Consumer Protection Act

Pushpa Jagannath Shetty vs Sahaj Ankur Realtors 2025 INSC 294 - S. 24A Consumer Protection Act - Limitation

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 24-A - Section 24-A of the Act prescribes the limitation period to be two years. The proviso thereto also provides for the possibility of the commission condoning delays beyond this point, but when doing so, it is to record its reasons- Limitation, while important

Consumer Protection Act

Chief Manager, Central Bank Of India vs Ad Bureau Advertising Pvt. Ltd 2025 INSC 288 - Consumer Protection Act - Commercial Purpose

Consumer Protection Act 1986 - Section 2(1)(d)(ii) - What is to be seen here is that whether the dominant intention or dominant purpose for the transaction was to facilitate some kind of profit generation for the person who has availed the service. (Para 21) [Context: National Consumer

Civil Law

Godrej Projects Development Limited vs Anil Karlekar 2025 INSC 143 - S 74 Contract Act - Forfeiture Of Earnest Money

Summary: Appeal against NCDRC order directing the Appellant to deduct only 10% of the Basic Sale Price (“BSP” for short) towards cancellation of the Complainants’ Apartment- Disposing appeal, SC observed: NCDRC, in a series of cases right from the year 2015, has held that 10% of the BSP is a

Consumer Protection Act

BPTP Limited Vs Terra Flat Buyers Association 2024 INSC 929 - Settlement- Consumer Case

Summary: As per the settlement in a consumer complaint, the appellants are required to pay the amount received from each of the complainants along with interest @ 9% per annum- whether the actual amount should be paid or it should be paid after deducting the TDS, as per the provisions of

Consumer Protection Act

Hongkong And Shanghai Banking Corp. Ltd. Vs Awaz 2024 INSC 1044 - Credit Card Interest - NCDRC Judgment

Credit Card - The rate of interest, charged by the banks, determined by the financial wisdom & directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, and is duly communicated to the credit card holders from time to time, cannot be in any manner unconscionable or unilateral. The credit card holders

Medical Negligence Consumer Complaints

Bherulal Bhimaji Oswal(D) vs Madhusudan N.Kumbhare 2024 INSC 1035 - Medical Negligence

Summary: NCDRC allowed the revision and consumer complaint alleging medical negligence was dismissed - Allowing appeal, SC directed to pay compensation of Rs. 3,50,000 to the complainant and observed: a blatant result of medical negligence by the respondent in post-operative care wherein corrective steps could have been taken,

Consumer Protection Act

Rajesh Kumar National Insurance Co. Ltd. 2024 INSC 993- S 21 Consumer Protection Act - Revisional Jurisdiction

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(b) - National Commission could not have interfered with pure finding of fact arrived at by the District and State Commissions while exercising revisional jurisdiction. (Para 13)- the conditions laid down in Section 21(b) are the only parameters under which a

Consumer Protection Act

Indore Development Authority vs Hemant Mandovra 2024 INSC 983 - Final Relief In Interlocutory Application

Summary: NCDRC confirmed the interim order granted by State Commission the appellant to handover possession of the plot in question to the respondent within three weeks from the date the amount is paid along with interest to the Indore Development Authority- Allowing appeal, SC observed: Final relief could not have