Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Larsen And Toubro Limited vs Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. 2025 INSC 523 -Ss.34.37 Arbitration Act - Time Limit On Oral Submissions

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 34,37- Lawyers' tendency to argue as if these proceedings were regular appeals - They must show restraint - The high monetary stakes involved in the proceedings should not result in unnecessarily long oral submissions or bulky written submissions. All this results

Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs Vishal Structurals Pvt. Ltd. 2025 INSC 507 - Ss. 7, 11,16,21, Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 11,21 - A notice invoking arbitration under Section 21 of the ACA is mandatory as it fixes the date of commencement of arbitration, which is essential for determining limitation periods and the applicable law, and it is a prerequisite to filing an

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Parsvnath Film City Ltd. vs Chandigarh Administration 2025 INSC 464 - Arbitration

Note: No legal aspects discussed in this judgment. 2025 INSC 464 Parsvnath Film City Ltd. vs Chandigarh Administration - Arbitration2025 INSC 464 Parsvnath Film City Ltd. vs Chandigarh Administration - Arbitration.pdf157 KBdownload-circleLawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian LawsDiscover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian law professionalsAI-Driven Legal Research

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

R. K.Transport Company vs Bharat Aluminum Company Ltd. (BALCO) 2025 INSC 438 - S. 34(3) Arbitration Act - Ss. 4,12 Limitation Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 34(3) ; Limitation Act 1961 - Section 4,12(1) - Section 12(1) of the Limitation Act applies while calculating the limitation period under Section 34(3) such that the day from which such period is to be reckoned must be excluded

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Ferro Concrete Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of Rajasthan 2025 INSC 429 - Arbitration - Grant Of Interest

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 31 - Arbitration Act 1940 -Under the 1940 Act, a stricter approach is followed that requires a clear and express clause against the payment of interest in case of difference, dispute, or misunderstanding, in case of delay of payment, or any other case

Consumer Protection Act

Citicorp Finance (India) Limited vs Snehasis Nanda 2025 INSC 371 - Consumer Protection Act

Consumer Protection Act 1986 - When there is no privity of contract between the concerned parties therein, no ‘deficiency’ would arise and the action (complaint) would not be maintainable before the concerned Consumer Forum. (Para 17) Consumer Protection Act 1986 - Section 24A - While the NCDRC is competent to

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board vs Bhagwan Devi (D) 2025 INSC 367 - S. 34 Arbitration Act - Land Acquisition - Private Agreement

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 34 - Award would be in conflict with the public policy of India if it is in contravention of the fundamental policy of Indian law or it is in conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice- When the State uses

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Disortho S.A.S. v. Meril Life Sciences Private Limited 2025 INSC 352- Arbitration Agreement - Lex Arbitri

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Matters such as filling vacancies on arbitral tribunals and the removal of an arbitrator through the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction, in the absence of a clear mechanism within the arbitration agreement, should be normally governed by the law applicable to the arbitration agreement itself,

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

AC Chokshi Share Broker Private Limited vs Jatin Pratap Desai 2025 INSC 174- Ss 16,34,37 Arbitration Act - BSE Bylaws

Arbitration and Conciliation Act -Section 16,34 - When the jurisdictional issue has not been raised in accordance with Section 16, it is deemed that the objecting party has waived his right, in terms of Section 4, to raise the same at a later stage. Such objection cannot be raised

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

2025 INSC 138 C & C Constructions Ltd. vs IRCON International Ltd - S 37 Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 37 - Scope of interference in an appeal - Quoted from Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Company v. Union of India: In appeal, Section 37 of the Act grants narrower scope to the appellate court to review the findings in an award, if

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

2025 INSC 113 Somdatt Builders –NCC – NEC(JV) vs National Highways Authority Of India 2025 INSC 113 - Ss 34,37 Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 34 - a great deal of restraint is required to be shown while examining the validity of an arbitral award when such an award has been upheld, wholly or substantially, under Section 34 of the 1996 Act- Frequent interference with arbitral awards would defeat

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Vidyawati Construction Company vs Union Of India 2025 INSC 101 - S 16 Arbitration Act - Plea Of Lack Of Jurisdiction

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996- Section 16 - There is a clear bar on raising a plea of the lack of jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal after submission of the statement of defence. (Para 12-13) Vidyawati Construction Company vs Union Of India 2025 INSC 101 Vidyawati Construction Company vs Union

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

S. Jayalakshmi vs Special District Revenue Officer - Ss 34,37 Arbitration Act - Modification Of Award

Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 34,37 - While exercising jurisdiction under Section 34 and 37, courts cannot modify an arbitral award - Referred to Project Director, National Highways No. 45 E and 220, National Highways Authority of India vs. M. Hakeem (2021) 9 SCC 1. S. Jayalakshmi vs

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Air Shagoon (Network) Pvt Ltd vs ABW Infrasturture Ltd - Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 8 - When the tenancy is not protected, the application under Section 8 is maintainable and the case is not covered under the Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. Vs. SBI Home Finance Ltd. [(2011) 5 SCC 532] judgment. Air Shagoon (Network) Pvt Ltd

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

My Preferred Transformation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. vs Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd. 2025 INSC 56 - S 34(3) Arbitration Act -S 4 Limitation Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996- Section 34(3) ; Limitation Act 1963 - Section 4 ; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 10 - Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies to Section 34(3) of the ACA.- Section 4 of the Limitation Act benefits a party only when the “prescribed

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs R.K. Pandey 2025 INSC 48 - Arbitration Act - Arbitration Agreement

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 -An arbitration agreement is sine qua non for arbitration proceedings, as arbitration fundamentally relies on the principle of party autonomy; - the right of parties to choose arbitration as an alternative to court adjudication - ‘Existence’ of the arbitration agreement is a prerequisite for an

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

United India Insurance Company Limited Odisha Hydra Power Corporation Ltd - Remedy Against Dismissal Of Arbitration Appeal

Constitution of India - Article 136,226,227 ; Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 34,37 - SLP filed against order in Arbitration Appeal filed by District Judge -SC held: When an arbitral award is confirmed in a petition under Section 34 and in an appeal under Section 37

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. 2025 INSC 26 - Art. 227 Constitution - Arbitration

Constitution of India - Article 227 - Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 -Judicial restraint in interfering with matters governed under Part I of the Act relating to arbitration agreement, composition and jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal, coupled with the conduct of the proceedings and making, challenge and enforcement of the award

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs S.A. Builders Ltd. 2024 INSC 988 - S 31,33 Arbitration Act - Post Award Interest

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 31(7) - Post-award interest can be granted by an arbitrator on the interest amount awarded- The includes the principal as adjudged together with the interest granted.[Referred to Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd. Vs. Governor, State of Orissa (2015) 2 SCC 189] (Para

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Tarun Dhameja Vs Sunil Dhameja 2024 INSC 973 - Arbitration Clause Interpretation

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - An Arbitration clause states that if any dispute arises, the arbitration shall be optional and the Arbitrator will be appointed by the partners with their mutual consent - This means that the arbitration clause can be invoked by an aggrieved party who wants to

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Dushyant Janbandhu Vs Hyundai Autoever India Pvt. Ltd. 2024 INSC 966 - S 11(6) Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 11(6) -Disputes related to non-payment of wages and legality and propriety of termination that were anyway pending before the statutory authorities are non-arbitrable. (Para 17) Summary- HC allowed a petition filed under Section 11(6) - Allowing appeal, SC observed Section 11(

Section 34 Arbitration Act

Kirpal Singh Vs Government Of India 2024 INSC 944 - S 34 Arbitration Act - S 14 Limitation Act

?Whether Section 14 Limitation Act is applicable to application under Section 34 of Arbitration Act? Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 34,37 - Limitation Act 1963 - Section 14 - The provisions of Section 14 of the Limitation Act would be applicable to an application submitted under Section

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd. vs General Manager 2024 INSC 889 - Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 29A- an application for extension can be filed either before or after the termination of the Tribunal’s mandate upon expiry of the statutory and extendable period.- Referred to Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Berger Paints India Ltd- The meaning of

Lifeforce Cryobank Sciences Inc vs Cyroviva Biotech Pvt. Ltd 2024 INSC 860 - S 11(6) Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 11(6) - At the stage of consideration of a prayer under Section 11(6) of the 1996 Act the Court has to confine itself to the examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement (vide sub-section (6-A) of Section 11)- It

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV) 2024 INSC 857 - Arbitration - Unilateral Clause

Arbitration and Conciliation Act -The principle of equal treatment of parties applies at all stages of arbitration proceedings, including the stage of appointment of arbitrators-. The Arbitration Act does not prohibit PSUs from empanelling potential arbitrators. However, an arbitration clause cannot mandate the other party to select its arbitrator from