Suresh Sahu vs State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) 2025 INSC 1382.S.313 CrPC - Non-Examination Of Material Witness

Note

You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:

Read Judgment In LawLens

Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 - Section 313 ; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 - Section 351 - The purpose of recording the statement of an accused under Section 313 CrPC (Section 351 BNSS) is to make the accused aware of the circumstances as appearing against him in the prosecution case and to seek his explanation for the same. For this purpose, the accused must be informed of each and every incriminating circumstance which the prosecution intends to rely upon for bringing home the guilt of the accused. Omission to put material circumstances to the accused in the statement under Section 313 CrPC (Section 351 BNSS) would cause grave prejudice and may, in a given case, even prove fatal to the case of the prosecution. Of course, the appellate Court can rectify this error by requiring that a fresh statement under Section 313 CrPC (Section 351 BNSS) be recorded for removing the lacunae, if any, in this procedure. [Context: in this case, Supreme Court noted that these statements are almost a reproduction of the language of the charge and, in no manner, convey to the accused persons the incriminating circumstances/evidence produced by the prosecution so as to indict them for the crime. Held: This defect goes to the root of the matter.]

Criminal Trial - Evidence- Non-examination of a material witness would give rise to adverse inference and the benefit thereof would normally go to the defence unless of course a satisfactory explanation for the omission was offered. (Para 25) The testimony of a defence witness carries the same evidentiary value as that of a prosecution witness- The evidence of a witness cannot be discarded merely on the ground that the witnesses were examined by the defence. (Para 48-49)

Case Info


Case Details

  • Case name: Suresh Sahu & Another v. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)
  • Neutral citation: 2025 INSC 1382
  • Coram: Justice Vikram Nath; Justice Sandeep Mehta
  • Judgment dateNovember 27, 2025
  • Disposition: Appeal allowed; conviction set aside; appellants acquitted and to be released forthwith if not wanted in any other case.

Caselaws and citations referred

  • Ashok v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2024 INSC 919
  • Ramji Prasad Jaiswal v. State of Bihar, (2025) 2 SCC 381; 2025 INSC 738
  • Harvinder Singh @ Bachhu v. State of Himachal Pradesh, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1347; 2023 INSC 907
  • Takhaji Hiraji v. Thakore Kubersing Chamansing, (2001) 6 SCC 145
  • State of U.P. v. Babu Ram, (2000) 4 SCC 515
  • Munshi Prasad v. State of Bihar, (2002) 1 SCC 351

Statutes/laws referred

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Sections 120B302302/149, and modification to 302/34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): Sections 313161164
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS): Sections 351 (parallel to CrPC 313), 180 (parallel to CrPC 161), 183 (parallel to CrPC 164)
  • Constitution of India: Article 136 (Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction)