Sunny alias Sanjeev v. State of Himachal Pradesh - S.430 BNSS - Bail Conditions
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 - Section 430 - Power of appellate court to suspend the execution of the sentence pending appeal - A sentence may comprise imprisonment and fine. Therefore, the power to suspend extends to the fine component as well. While conditions may be imposed to secure the presence of the appellant and the progress of the appeal, they cannot be such as to render the order of suspension illusory for want of means. A condition which is impossible to comply with, defeats the right of appeal. (Para 5-6) [Context: SC deleting the requirement in HC order that the accused-appellant should deposit the fine amount of ₹1,00,000/- as a pre-condition for release and observed: insisting on an upfront deposit of ₹1,00,000/- as a condition for release would, in his case, defeat the suspension that the High Court otherwise granted. ]
Case Info
Case Name and Neutral Citation
- Case Name: Sunny alias Sanjeev v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- Neutral Citation: Not explicitly provided in the order, but can be referenced as Criminal Appeal No(s). of 2025 (Arising from SLP(Crl) No(s). 13146 of 2025), Supreme Court of India, Order dated August 29, 2025.
Coram
- Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta
Judgment Date
- Date of Judgment: August 29, 2025
Caselaws and Citations Referred
- No specific previous case laws or citations are mentioned in this order.
Statutes / Laws Referred
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Section 376(2), Sections 363 and 366)
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) (Section 4)
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) (Section 430)
#SupremeCourt says a condition imposed in an order of suspension of sentence which is impossible to comply, defeats the right of appeal. https://t.co/8Ocsla5ehN pic.twitter.com/rh9RQXAI7U
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) September 3, 2025