State of Uttar Pradesh v. Milkiyat Singh 2025 INSC 1427 -Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act
You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:
Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 - Section 5,103 - A. Section 103 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 does not, by itself, confer an automatic or deemed status of a multi-State cooperative society upon every society registered under a State Cooperative Societies Act merely because the parent State has undergone reorganisation. B. The applicability of Section 103 requires a factual enquiry in each case as to whether the objects of the society extend to more than one State. If the objects are found to span more than one State, the deeming fiction under Section 103 will operate and the society would be treated as a multi-State cooperative society. If the objects remain confined to only one State, the status of the society will remain unchanged. C. It would be erroneous to undertake an enquiry into the area of operation of a society for the purposes of Section 103, when the provision itself mandates an examination only of the objects of the society. Read with Section 5, it becomes evident that Section 103 is attracted only where the objects of the society extend to more than one State. It is only in such situation that the society would, by operation of law, be treated as a multi-State cooperative society.D. The residence or domicile of the members of the cooperative society has no bearing on determining whether the society is a multi-State cooperative society. E. Section 5 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 mandates that a society may be registered as a multiState cooperative society only when its principal objects, as reflected in its bye-laws, serve the interests of members in more than one State. It is, therefore, a pre-condition that the objects span more than one State. (Para 15)
Case Info
Case Details
- Coram: Vikram Nath, J.; Sandeep Mehta, J.
- Judgment date: December 15, 2025
- Neutral citation: 2025 INSC 1427
- Case name: State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary & Ors. v. Milkiyat Singh & Ors. etc.
Caselaws and citations
- Naresh Shankar Srivastava v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2009) 16 SCC 157.
- Southern Electricity Supply Co. of Orissa Ltd. v. Sri Seetaram Rice Mill, (2012) 2 SCC 108.
Statutes/laws referred
- Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002: Sections 3(n), 3(p), 5, 9, 10(2)(a)-(b), 22, 103.
- Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 1984 (repealed): Section 95 (corresponding to Section 103 of 2002 Act).
- Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965.
- Cooperative Societies Act, 1912 (repealed in U.P. by the 1965 Act).
- U.P. State Reorganization Act, 2000.
- State Reorganisation Act, 1956 (Part II).
- U.P. Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2007 (No. 21 of 2007).
- Constitution of India: Article 226 (context of writ petitions).

#SupremeCourt holds that Section 103 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, does not, by itself, confer an automatic or deemed status of a multi-State cooperative society upon every society registered under a State Cooperative Societies Act merely because the parent State… https://t.co/nLf5QyJqwb pic.twitter.com/Iq0mVZFlmO
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) December 15, 2025