Shahid Alam v. Arun Kumar Yadav @ Balmiki Yadav - CPC - Res Judicata
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 - Section 11 -The issue of res judicata is a right which inheres in a person who raises the same, and has to be considered on its own merits- The plea of res judicata has to be taken at the very first instance so as to prevent the misuse and abuse of the process of the Court so that matters already decided are not re-agitated and have to go through the same paraphernalia. Thus, there has to be judicial application of mind to arrive at a decision whether such plea is sustainable. (Para 6) ][Context: In the suit filed, a petition to dismiss the same on the ground of res judicata was filed - It was held that the same would be considered along with the main suit - Allowing appeal, SC remanded back the case to the High Court for fresh consideration on merits, especially with regard to the issue of res judicata. ]
Case Info
Key Details
- Case name: Shahid Alam v. Arun Kumar Yadav @ Balmiki Yadav & Ors.
- Neutral citation: Not provided on the page.
- Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
- Judgment date: 18 November 2025
- Case numbers: C.A. No. 13778/2025 arising out of SLP(C) No. 8540/2025; CMP No. 602/2024 (High Court of Jharkhand)
Statutes/Laws Referred
- Res judicata under Section 11, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is implicated by the discussion, though not expressly named.
- Procedural remand and status quo directions issued; no other statutes are expressly referred.
The issue of res judicata is a right which inheres in a person who raises the same, and has to be considered on its own merits. There has to be judicial application of mind to arrive at a decision whether such plea is sustainable.#SupremeCourt https://t.co/J7dQwfoMLC pic.twitter.com/r8agRSeVr8
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) November 25, 2025