Sethia Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Mafatlal Mangilal Kothari 2025 INSC 985 - Restoration Application
Sign in to read our notes on this judgment. Register @ citecase.in to subscribe !
Restoration Application - When a Court is dealing with an application for restoration of any matter which is dismissed for nonprosecution and the application for restoration is filed after huge delay, the Court must be cognizant of the fact that time does not stand still. Whenever delay of a long period of time is sought to be condoned, the Court should not rule out involvement of third parties in the litigation. In fact, the Court must presume that third party rights may have been created and/or additional parties may have developed rights and interest in the litigation. (Para 12)
Case Info
Case Name and Neutral Citation
- Case Name: M/s. Sethia Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Mafatlal Mangilal Kothari & Ors.
- Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 985
Coram (Judges)
- Justice Rajesh Bindal
- Justice Manmohan
Judgment Date
- August 14, 2025
Caselaws and Citations
- The High Court’s order refers to the ratio in:(2008) 11 S.C.R. 1(The specific case name is not mentioned in the provided text, only the citation.)
#SupremeCourt on how to deal with restoration applications filed after huge delay: https://t.co/dNsLzub5oj pic.twitter.com/ftblVtpnKK
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) August 14, 2025
Suggested Readings:
