Sathyan Naravoor v. Union of India - Persons With Disabilities - Undertrials & Convicts

Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - PIL seeking directions for providing appropriate legal framework and facilities to persons with disabilities1 who are undergoing incarceration in the prisons either as undertrials or convicts- Directions issued: A. The directions issued by this Court in . Muruganantham v. State of Tamil Nadu  shall be extended to all the States and the Union Territories, to ensure that the principles are adopted mutatis mutandis within their prison systems as well. B. Every State and Union Territories shall establish a robust, independent and accessible grievance redressal mechanism specifically designed for prisoners with disabilities. The said mechanism shall ensure prompt registration, effective monitoring and timely resolution of complaints, so as to safeguard inmates from systemic neglect, abuse and discriminatory practices. C. Appropriate facilities shall be created to ensure that prisoners with disabilities have meaningful access to inclusive education within the prison system. No inmate shall be deprived of the opportunity to pursue educational programmes solely on account of disability, and suitable adjustments shall be made to facilitate their effective participation. D. Section 89 of the RPwd Act shall mutatis mutandis be made applicable to prison establishments across the country. All prison authorities shall take adequate steps to disseminate awareness of the obligations flowing from the said provision to all officers, staff, legal-aid personnel, and other stakeholders. 13 E. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has sought directions for the provision of appropriate assistive devices, mobility aids, and other support equipment to prisoners with disabilities. However, considering the crucial issue relating to prison security and the practical modalities of implementation, we, for the present, deem it appropriate to call upon all States and Union Territories to indicate in its compliance report the structured institutional mechanism proposed to ensure the regular availability, maintenance, and secure provision of assistive devices, mobility aids, and other disability-support equipment for prisoners with disabilities. The affidavit shall clearly outline the procedures, infrastructure, procurement systems, supervision protocols, and security measures by which such assistive aids will be made accessible to inmates, enabling them to carry out their daily activities with dignity without compromising institutional safety. F. Prisoners with benchmark disabilities shall be entitled to enhanced visitation provisions, in order to ensure sustained family support, emotional well-being, and continuous monitoring of their special needs. The specific modalities for such visitation shall be framed by 14 the concerned departmental head of each State and Union Territory so as to balance security considerations with the imperative of accessibility and humane treatment.

Case Info


Extracted Details

  • Case name: Sathyan Naravoor v. Union of India & Ors.
  • Neutral citation: 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1444
  • Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath; Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta
  • Judgment/hearing date: 02-12-2025
  • Listed next: 7 April, 2026 (for compliance reports)

Caselaws and Citations

  • L. Muruganantham v. State of Tamil Nadu & Others: 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1444Referenced extensively; directions extended nationwide.

Statutes/Laws Referred

  • Constitution of India: Article 32
  • Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act): Sections 404589
  • Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2017: Rule 15
  • UNCRPD: United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
  • Harmonized Guidelines and Standards for Universal Accessibility in India (2021)
  • State Prison Manuals (to be amended for compliance)