Raj Pal Singh v. Rajveer & Ors.; 2025 INSC 1442 - Criminal Trial - Appeal Against Acquittal

Note

You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:

Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 - Section 378,386- There must exist “substantial and compelling reasons” to upset the acquittal. Once the court acquits the accused, the presumption of innocence is reinforced. Thereafter, the interference by the appellate court would be minimal and has to be guided by strong and cogent reasons. Reversal of acquittal should not be a matter of course just because the other view is considered to be possible by the appellate court. Even when the appellate court re-appreciates the evidence while dealing with the judgment and order of acquittal, the innocence attributed to the accused acquitted from the charges of offences would be a weighty rebuttable factor.(Para 9.2)

Criminal Trial - The guilt of the accused and the commission of the offence by the accused have to be established beyond reasonable doubt. The circumstances should suggest “must or should” and not “may be”. (Para 9)

Case Info


Case Details

  • Case name: Raj Pal Singh v. Rajveer & Ors.
  • Neutral citation: 2025 INSC 1442
  • Coram: N.V. Anjaria, J.; K. Vinod Chandran, J.
  • Judgment date: 16 December 2025

Caselaws and citations

  • Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra, 1973 (2) SCC 793.
  • Chandrappa & Others v. State of Karnataka, 2007 (4) SCC 415.

Statutes/laws referred

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Sections 302, 34.
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 313.