Palm Groves Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. v. Magar Girme and Gaikwad Associates, 2025 INSC 1023 - Consumer Protection Act - Interpretation Of Statutes
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 25(1) Of Consumer Protection Act 1986 !
You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:
Consumer Protection Act 1986 - Section 25(1) - Section 25(1) of the 1986 Act shall be read as enumerated below for the period from 15.03.2003 to 20.07.2020 with reference to all pending proceedings at any stage for execution of any order passed under the 1986 Act. “Section 25. Enforcement of orders of the District Forum, the State Commission or the National Commission. (1) Where any order made under this Act is not complied with, the District Forum or the State Commission or the National Commission, as the case may be, enforce the same in the manner as if it were a decree or order made by the Court in a suit and the provisions of Order XXI of the First Schedule to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 shall, as far as may be, applicable and may order the property of the person, not complying with such order to be attached.” (Para 38)
Consumer Protection Act 1986 - Section 39,15- Against an order passed by the District Forum in execution petition, an appeal shall lie to the State Commission under Section 15 with no further remedy of appeal or revision. (Para 39)
Interpretation Of Statutes - Normal principle of statutory interpretation is that when the words used in the statute are clear and unambiguous, the same should be given their normal meaning without adding or rejecting any word. However, there is an exception to this general rule. In case, the Court finds that the provision is vague and ambiguous or the normal meaning may lead to confusion, absurdity or repugnancy with other provisions, the court may by using the interpretative tools, set right the situation by adding or omitting or substituting words in the statute. (Para 18)
Court Orders - An order passed by any court, or any forum is merely a kind of paper decree unless effective relief is granted to the party entitled thereto. The consumers of justice should feel that they have received justice in reality and not merely on papers. (Para 30)
Consumer Protection Act 2019 - Sections 71 to 73 - More teeth have been provided to the District, State and the National Commission for enforcement of the orders passed by them. The words used in Section 71 provides for enforcement of ‘every order’. Similarly, Section 72 uses the words ‘any order’. Beside civil proceedings for enforcement of orders, for non-compliance thereof, criminal liability has also been provided. The words, as used in the aforesaid sections, clearly include ‘interim orders’ and the ‘final orders’. (Para 14.5)
Case Info
Case Name and Neutral Citation
- Case Name: Palm Groves Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. v. M/s Magar Girme and Gaikwad Associates & Ors.
- Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 1023
Coram
- Bench: J.K. Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal, JJ.
Judgment Date
- Date: August 22, 2025
Caselaws and Citations Referred
The judgment refers to several Supreme Court decisions, including:
- Karnataka Housing Board v. K.A. Nagamani
- 2019 INSC 631; (2019) 7 SCR 218
- Kamlesh Aggarwal v. Narain Singh Dabbas and Anr
- 2015 INSC 962; (2015) 2 SCR 133
- Ibrat Faizan vs. Omaxe Buildhome Private Limited
- 2022 INSC 573; (2022) 4 SCR 632
- M/s Universal Sompo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Suresh Chand Jain & Anr
- 2023 INSC 649; (2023) 10 SCR 1155
- Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank vs PFC
- 2009 INSC 1174; (2009) 15 SCR 1
- Corporation Bank vs Saraswati
- 2008 INSC 1321; (2008) 16 SCR 340
- MSR Leathers vs S Palaniappan
- 2013 INSC 604; (2013) 10 SCR 81
- Poonam Devi vs Oriental Insurance
- 2020 INSC 291; (2020) 4 SCR 922
- Sailesh vs Dhariwal
- (2016) 3 SCC 619
- Bank of Baroda vs MBL
- 2022 INSC 53; (2022) 12 SCR 761
- Chitra Sharma vs UOI
- (2018) 18 SCC 575
- Swiss Ribbons Private Limited and Another vs Union of India and Others
- (2019) 2 SCC 17
- State of Karnataka v. Vishwabharathi House Building Coop. Society
- (2003) 2 SCC 412; 2003 INSC 19
- Ethiopian Airlines v. Ganesh Narain Saboo
- (2011) 8 SCC 539; 2011 INSC 556
- Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund v. Kartick Das
- (1994) 4 SCC 225; 1994 INSC 220
- Gulzari Lal Agarwal v. Accounts Officer
- (1996) 10 SCC 590; 1996 INSC 1108
- Surjit Singh Kalra vs Union of India
- (1991) 2 SCC 87; 1991 INSC 365
- Rajbir Singh Dalal vs Chaudhari Devi Lal University
- (2008) 9 SCC 284; 2008 INSC 913
- Afcons Infrastructure Limited and Another v. Cherian Varkey Construction Company Private Limited and Others
- (2010) 8 SCR 1053; (2010) 8 SCC 245
- Child in Conflict with Law through his Mother vs State of Karnataka and Another
- (2024) 8 SCC 473; 2024 INSC 387
Statutes/Laws Referred
- Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (as amended by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002)
- Consumer Protection Act, 2019
- Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Order XXI and other relevant provisions)
- Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (mentioned as replacement for CrPC)
#SupremeCourt replaces the word “interim order” in Section 25(1) of Consumer Protection Act 1986 with “any order” ! https://t.co/5PqVD6TYHg pic.twitter.com/6xJb7mnwNx
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) August 22, 2025
An order passed by any court, or any forum is merely a kind of paper decree unless effective relief is granted to the party entitled thereto. The consumers of justice should feel that they have received justice in reality and not merely on papers.#SupremeCourtofIndia https://t.co/5PqVD6UwwO pic.twitter.com/N5ZKmeDiK1
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) August 22, 2025
Today’s #SupremeCourt judgment quotes @mkatju ’s judgment on Interpretation Of Statutes 🤣 https://t.co/Fkq0XNqVXG pic.twitter.com/HnP18Q3B6m
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) August 22, 2025
