Office For Alternative Architecture vs IRCON Infrastructure And Services Ltd. 2025 INSC 665 - S.11 Arbitration Act
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 11 - In this case, while appointing an arbitral tribunal, High Court excluded certain claims by holding them to be non-arbitrable - Allowing appeal, SC observed: High Court fell in error in bisecting the claim of the appellant into two parts, one arbitrable and the other not arbitrable, when it found arbitration agreement to be there for settlement of disputes between the parties. The correct course for the High Court was to leave it open to the party to raise the issue of non-arbitrability of certain claims before the arbitral tribunal, which, if raised, could be considered and decided by it. (Para 12)
LawLens - AI-Driven Legal Research for Indian Laws
Discover AI-powered legal research tools for Indian law professionals
