Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar (Rohit) v. State of Gujarat; 2025 INSC 1433 - Criminal - Practice - Incorporation Of Tabular Charts

Note

You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:

Practice and Procedure- All trial Courts dealing with criminal matters shall, at the conclusion of the judgment, incorporate tabulated charts summarizing: a. Witnesses examined, b. Documents exhibited, and c. Material objects (muddamal) produced and exhibited- These charts shall form an appendix or concluding segment of the judgment and shall be prepared in a clear, structured and easily comprehensible format. (Para 82)

Criminal Trial -The effect of a vital omission in the first information report discussed. (Para 35) principles governing a case based purely on circumstantial evidence discussed. (Para 22)

Case Info


Coram is Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, judgment dated December 15, 2025.


Case Details

  • Case Name: Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar (Rohit) v. State of Gujarat.
  • Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 1433.
  • Coram: Vikram Nath, J.; Sandeep Mehta, J.
  • Judgment Date: December 15, 2025.

Caselaws and Citations

  • Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116.
  • Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra, (1973) 2 SCC 793.
  • Amar Nath Jha v. Nand Kishore Singh, (2018) 9 SCC 137.
  • Ram Kumar Pandey v. State of M.P., AIR 1975 SC 1026.

Statutes/Laws Referred

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Sections 363, 376(2)(i), 201.
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: Sections 3, 4.
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Sections 161, 313.
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Section 27.
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (referenced for evidentiary compliance context).