KrishnaKant Kwivedy vs State of Chhattisgarh 2025 INSC 958 - S.482 CrPC - Meaning "Manifestly Attended With Mala Fide"
What is the scope of expression “manifestly attended with mala fide” as appearing in Bhajanlal case?
Sign in to read our notes on this judgment. Register @ citecase.in to subscribe !
Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 - Section 482 - The expression “manifestly attended with mala fide” following criminal proceedings, as appearing in clause 7 of paragraph 102 of Bhajanlal case- The mala fide must be manifest on the face of the FIR - whether or not there has been misrepresentation is entirely a question of fact which cannot be decided at the stage when the inherent powers of the High Court are invoked for quashing of an FIR/criminal proceedings. Such a question obviously has to be left for a decision at the trial, if at all a defence to that effect is raised, and it would then be for the trial court to consider the same while it returns its findings on the question of guilt or otherwise. (Para 11)
Case Info
Case Name and Neutral Citation
- Case Name: KrishnaKant Kwivedy & Another v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others
- Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 958
Coram (Judges)
- Justice Dipankar Datta
- Justice Augustine George Masih
Judgment Date
- August 8, 2025
Caselaws and Citations Referred
- State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335
- Clause 7 of paragraph 102 cited regarding quashing of criminal proceedings on grounds of mala fide.
Statutes/Laws Referred
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Section 482 (Inherent powers of High Court)
- Section 173(2) (Charge-sheet)
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
- Sections 3 and 4 (Offences related to dowry demands)