Kishundeo Rout vs Govind Rao & 2025 INSC 956 - Adverse Possession Plea At Appellate Stage
Can Adverse Possession Plea Raised At Appellate Stage For The First Time?
Sign in to read our notes on this judgment. Register @ citecase.in to subscribe !
Adverse Possession - The foundation for the plea of adverse possession must be laid in the pleadings and then an issue must be framed and tried. (Para 19) The plea of adverse possession is not always a legal plea. Indeed, it is always based on facts which must be asserted and proved. A person who claims adverse possession must show on what date he came into possession, what was the nature of his possession, whether the factum of his possession was known to the legal claimants and how long his possession continued. He must also show whether his possession was open and undisturbed. These are all questions of fact and unless they are asserted and proved, a plea of adverse possession cannot be inferred from them. (Para 20)
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 - Section 96 - Plea of adverse possession - A plea not properly raised in the pleadings or in issues at the stage of trial would not be permitted to be raised for the first time at the stage of First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). (Para 19) in normal cases an appellate Court will not allow the plea of adverse possession to be raised before it. There is no doubt some cases in which the plea will be allowed because in some form the allegation upon which it can be raised was made at the time and the facts necessary to prove the plea were brought before the court and proved. (Para 20) unless the plea of adverse possession has. been specifically raised in the pleadings, put in issue, and then cogent and convincing evidence led on a multitude of points, and an opportunity to refute the case made out by the plaintiff, availed of by the defendant, the plea of adverse possession cannot be allowed to be flung as a surprise, on an unsuspecting defendant, for the first time in appeal. (Para 30)
Pleadings - principle of secundum allegata et probata - A party can only succeed according to what he has alleged and proved, otherwise, on the principle of secundum allegata et probata, a party is not allowed to succeed, where he has not set up the case which he wants to substantiate. (Para 24)
Case Info
Case Name and Neutral Citation
- Case Name: Kishundeo Rout & Ors. v. Govind Rao & Ors.
- Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 956
Coram (Judges)
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan
Judgment Date
- 8th August, 2025
Caselaws and Citations Referred
- Ganda Singh and Ors. v. Ram Narain Singh
- ILR (1959) 1 P&H 385
- Municipal Board, Etawah v. Mt. Ram Sri and another
- AIR 1931 All. 670
- Krishna Churn Baisack and others v. Protab Chunder Surma
- ILR 7 Cal. 560
- Ram Singh v. Deputy Commissioner of Bara Banki
- ILR 17 Cal. 444
- Lachhmi Sewak Sahu v. Ram Rup Sahu and others
- AIR 1944 PC 24
- Somasundarum Chetty v. Vadivelu Pillai
- ILR 31 Mad. 531
- Trojan and Co., Ltd. v. RM. N. N. Nagappa Chettier
- 1953 SCR 789 (806)
- Nepen Bala Debi v. Siti Kanta Banerji
- 8 I.C. 41
- Lilabati Misrain v. Bishun Chobey
- (No citation provided, but referenced)
- Shiro Kumari Debi v. Gobind Shaw Tanti
- ILR 2 Cal. 418
- Ravinder Kaur Grewal and Others v. Manjit Kaur and Others
- AIR 2019 SC 3827
Statutes/Laws Referred
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
- Section 96 (First Appeal)
- Section 107 (Powers of Appellate Court)
- Limitation Act, 1963
- Article 65 (Limitation for possession of immovable property or any interest therein based on title)
- Section 3 (Bar of limitation)
- Section 27 (Extinguishment of right to property)
- Principles of Law of Pleadings
- secundum allegata et probata (pleadings and proof must correspond)
#SupremeCourt in this judgment discusses whether a plea of adverse possession can be raised for the first time in appeal: https://t.co/UWG0uDBIr9 pic.twitter.com/Ik3ABSI4ym
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) August 11, 2025
