Kaushal Singh Vs State Of Rajashtan 2025 INSC 871 - Bail - Strictures Against Judicial Officers
We make notes on all Supreme Court judgments for our subscribers’ community consisting of judges, lawyers and students of law and share it in this website. If you want to access them, you can join the community which costs you just ₹2 per day.
Practice and Procedure - Judiciary - High Courts should ordinarily refrain from passing strictures against the judicial officers while deciding matters on the judicial side. The Courts higher in the judicial hierarchy should refrain from commenting on the conduct and calib of judicial officers- Referred to Re: ‘K’, A Judicial Officer and Sonu Agnihotri v. Chandra Shekhar. (Para 18-20)
Practice and Procedure -Bail - Referred to the rules and orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, to be specific, Rule 5 of Chapter 1-A(b) Volume-V specifically provide as below: “5. Bail applications and observed: Every High Court in the country should consider incorporating a similar provision in the respective High Court Rules and/or Criminal Side Rules as it would impose an obligation on the accused to make disclosures regarding his/her involvement in any other criminal case(s) previously registered. (Para 22-23)
High Courts should ordinarily refrain from passing strictures against the judicial officers while deciding matters on the judicial side.#SupremeCourt https://t.co/gsW7Ix61U7 pic.twitter.com/zRKYSsFW43
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) July 18, 2025
#SupremeCourt urges all High Courts to make Rules similar to the one made by Punjab and Haryana High Court imposing an obligation on the accused to make disclosures in his bail application regarding his involvement in any other criminal case(s) previously registered. https://t.co/gsW7Ix61U7 pic.twitter.com/EZyMUgzfT3
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) July 18, 2025
