Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs Green Infra Corporate Wind Private Limited 2025 INSC 922 - Electricity Act
Electricity Act 2003 -The price at which power is to be procured by a distribution licensee from a generating company is not a matter of consensus and private agreement between the parties as it is to be fixed statutorily by the Appropriate Commission. [Context: SC held that GUVNL cannot, therefore, fix its own price or bind a generating company to such price, contrary to the dictum of the GERC. ] (Para 21)
GUVNL - While dismissing appeal filed by GUVNL, SC observed: GUVNL cannot be guided only by its own commercial interests, like a private business entity and itโs conduct, as a State-instrumentality, must be of the standard of a model citizen. However, patently unfair treatment was sought to be meted out by GUVNL to the respondent companies by binding them to a rate that was wholly inapplicable to them. Such conduct, akin to a Shylock, does not reflect positively upon GUVNL.(Para 24)
Case Info
Case Name and Neutral Citation
- Case Name: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Green Infra Corporate Wind Private Limited and Others
- Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 922
Coram
- Justice Sanjay Kumar
- Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
Judgment Date
- August 4, 2025
Caselaws and Citations
- Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. EMCO Limited and another
- Citation: (2016) 11 SCC 182
- Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Tarini Infrastructure Limited and others
- Citation: (2016) 8 SCC 743
Statutes/Laws Referred
- Electricity Act, 2003
- Sections 61(h), 62(1)(a), 64, 86(1)(a), 86(1)(b)
- Income Tax Act, 1961
- Section 32 (Depreciation)
- Income Tax Rules, 1962
- Rule 5, Appendix I, Appendix IA
#SupremeCourt judgment on Electricity Act: https://t.co/xFcSwvjJDW pic.twitter.com/YWOd2mIiLf
โ CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ (@CiteCase) August 4, 2025
When #SupremeCourt compared the conduct of GUVNL, a state-instrumentality, with that of Shylock : https://t.co/xFcSwvjJDW pic.twitter.com/Mrxr2xjr6c
โ CiteCase ๐ฎ๐ณ (@CiteCase) August 4, 2025
