Canara Bank v. M Michael Raj - CPC - Review - Subsequent Judgment
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 - Order XLVII Rule 1 - Review is impermissible on the basis of subsequent judgment having been rendered in favour of review petitioner in another case -The explanation to Rule 1 clearly prohibits filing of review petition due to subsequent judgment - Quoted from Sanjay Kumar Agarwal v. State Tax Officer (2024) 2 SCC 362 no review is available upon a change or reversal of a proposition of law by a superior court or by a larger Bench of this Court overruling its earlier exposition of law whereon the judgment/order under review was based. (Para 3-6)
Can a review petition be entertained on the ground that there is a subsequent judgment in favour of review petitioner? #SupremeCourt says NO ! https://t.co/ruGgGIC6aY pic.twitter.com/K3x6JNnL97
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) September 11, 2025