Arvind Dham v. Directorate of Enforcement 2026 INSC 12 - PMLA - Bail - Delayed Trial
You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:
Constitution of India - Article 21 ; Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 45 - If the State or any prosecuting agency including, the court, concerned has no wherewithal to provide or protect the fundamental right of an accused, to have a speedy trial as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution, then the State or any other prosecuting agency should not oppose the plea for bail on the ground that the crime committed is serious. Article 21 of the Constitution applies irrespective of the nature of the crime - Under the statutes such as PMLA, where maximum sentence is seven years, prolonged incarceration pending trial may warrant grant of bail by Constitutional Courts, if there is no likelihood of the trial concluding within a reasonable time. Statutory restrictions cannot be permitted to result in indefinite pretrial detention in violation of Article 21. Prolonged incarceration cannot be allowed to convert pretrial detention into punishment and that documentary evidence already seized by the prosecution eliminates the possibility of tampering with the same. The right to speedy trial, enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution, is not eclipsed by the nature of the offence. (Para 16-18)
Bail - Gravity of Offence - The court while dealing with the prayer for grant of bail has to consider gravity of offence, which has to be ascertained in the facts and circumstances of each case. One of the circumstances to consider the gravity of offences is also the term of sentence i.e., prescribed for the offence, the accused is alleged to have committed . The court has also to take into account the object of the special Act, the gravity of offence and the attending circumstances along with period of sentence. (Para 15)
Bail - Economic Offences- All economic offences cannot be classified into one group as it may involve various activities and may differ from one case to another. Therefore, it is not advisable on the part of the Court to categorize all the offences into one group and deny bail on that basis . (Para 15)
Case Info
- Case name: Arvind Dham v. Directorate of Enforcement.
- Neutral citation: 2026 INSC 12.
- Coram: Sanjay Kumar, J. and Alok Aradhe, J. (Judgment authored by Alok Aradhe, J.).
- Judgment date: January 6, 2026 (New Delhi).
- Caselaws and citations referred:
- Manish Sisodia v. Enforcement Directorate, (2024) 12 SCC 660.
- Padam Chand Jain v. Enforcement Directorate, (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1291.
- Udhaw Singh v. Directorate Enforcement, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 357.
- Prem Prakash v. Union of India, SLP (Crl.) No. 691 of 2023 – Order dated 04.10.2024.
- Dineshchand Surana v. Asst. Director, ED, SLP (Crl.) No. 15274 of 2024 – Order dated 06.08.2025.
- Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb, (2021) 3 SCC 713.
- Kapil Wadhawan v. CBI, SLP (Crl.) No. 16953 of 2025 – Judgment/Order dated 11.12.2025.
- Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan, (2004) 7 SCC 528.
- B. Rajesh Ranjan Yadav v. CBI, (2007) 1 SCC 70.
- P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2020) 13 SCC 791.
- Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, (2022) 10 SCC 51.
- Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra & Anr., (2024) 9 SCC 813.
- V. Senthil Balaji v. Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2626.
- Kalvakuntla Kavitha v. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2269.
- Sanjay Agarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1748.
- Ramkripal Meena v. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2276.
- Anil Tuteja v. Directorate of Enforcement, SLP (Crl) No. 3148 of 2025 (Order dated 15.04.2025).
- Neeraj Singal v. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3598.
- Abdul Razak Peediyakkal v. UOI, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 2326.
- Bimal Kumar Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement, SLP (Crl.) No. 7942/2021.
- Statutes/laws referred:
- Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (Section 45; Section 50).
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 483; proviso to Section 223).
- Indian Penal Code (Sections 120B, 420, 406, 468).
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Sections 13(2), 13(1)(d)).
- Constitution of India (Article 21).
- Insolvency: Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code context (mentioned, not cited by section).
