Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association v. Ansal Crown Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. - 2026 INSC 51. Consumer Protection Act - Companies Act - IBC
You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Section 71 - Execution must strictly conform to the decree - A decree cannot, by process of execution, be employed to shift or enlarge liability so as to bind persons who were neither parties to the decree nor otherwise legally liable thereunder. Where the judgment debtor is a company, the liability of its shareholders or joint venture partners remains confined to the extent of their shareholding or to such guarantees or undertakings as may have been expressly furnished by them. (Para 12-13)
Companies Act 2013 - A company registered under the Companies Act is a distinct legal entity other than the legal entity or entities that hold its shares - a clear distinction must be maintained between a company and its shareholders. (Para 16) Doctrine of lifting of the corporate veil - The lifting of the corporate veil is an exceptional measure, to be resorted to only upon a clear finding that the corporate personality was abused for fraudulent or dishonest purposes. Such a finding must be preceded by specific pleadings and a determination on merits. (Para 18)
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 14 - Once a moratorium has been declared against the judgment debtor company, the modes of execution contemplated under including attachment and sale of movable or immovable property, attachment of bank accounts, or withdrawal of decretal amounts from the accounts of the judgment debtor, stand interdicted. (Para 15)
Case Info
Case Details
- Case name: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association (Regd.) vs M/S Ansal Crown Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
- Neutral citation: 2026 INSC 51
- Coram: Justice Dipankar Datta; Justice Augustine George Masih
- Judgment date: January 12, 2026
- Appeals covered: Civil Appeal Nos. 8465-8466 of 2024; 8539 of 2024; 10874-10877 of 2024; 10878 of 2024
Statutes / Laws Referred
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 14 (moratorium), Section 14(3).
- Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Section 71 (execution mechanisms).
- Companies Act (general principles regarding separate legal entity and potential remedies mentioned).
Caselaws and Citations
- Rajbir v. Suraj Bhan, (2022) 14 SCC 609 — executing court cannot go beyond the decree.
- Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. v. Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of A.P., (1999) 4 SCC 458 — distinction between company and shareholder as separate legal entities.
- Supreme Court order dated January 17, 2024 (in Civil Appeals 4247, 4480, 4481 of 2023) — moratorium under IBC shields corporate debtor, not directors; execution may proceed against directors only if otherwise liable.
