Abhishek Gupta v. Dinesh Kumar 2025 INSC 1406 - Writ Jurisdiction - Principle Of Non-Joinder - Intra Court Appeal

Note

You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:

Constitution of India - Article 226 - The principle of non-joinder, though originating from the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, applies with equal force to writ proceedings. An order passed in writ jurisdiction without impleading an affected or necessary party is liable to be invalidated on that ground alone.  (Para 16) Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Chapter VIII Rule 5 - Where an allegation of non-joinder of a necessary party is raised in an intra-court appeal, the High Court, if satisfied that such allegation has merit, should either remand the matter to the Single Judge or decide it on the merits. (Para 19)

Legal Maxim- Ubi jus, ibi remedium - A party suffering an adverse order in judicial proceedings where he is not noticed, because he was not a party, cannot be left without a remedy. (Para 18)

Case Info

Case name: Abhishek Gupta v. Dinesh Kumar & Ors.

  • Neutral citation: 2025 INSC 1406
  • Coram: Justice Dipankar Datta; Justice Augustine George Masih
  • Judgment date: December 03, 2025 (New Delhi)

Caselaws and Citations

  • Smt. Jatan Kanwar Golcha v. Golcha Properties (P) Ltd.AIR 1971 SC 374
  • State of Punjab v. Amar SinghAIR 1974 SC 994
  • Sheet Gupta v. State of U.P.AIR 2010 All 46 (FB)

Statutes / Laws Referred

  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Article 227 of the Constitution of India
  • Article 136 of the Constitution of India
  • Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (principles of non‑joinder referenced)
  • Legal maxim ubi jus, ibi remedium